Abstract

Experimental studies have provided evidence that the visual processing areas of the primate brain represent facial identity and facial expression within different subpopulations of neurons. For example, in non-human primates there is evidence that cells within the inferior temporal gyrus (TE) respond primarily to facial identity, while cells within the superior temporal sulcus (STS) respond to facial expression. More recently, it has been found that the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) of non-human primates contains some cells that respond exclusively to changes in facial identity, while other cells respond exclusively to facial expression. How might the primate visual system develop physically separate representations of facial identity and expression given that the visual system is always exposed to simultaneous combinations of facial identity and expression during learning? In this paper, a biologically plausible neural network model, VisNet, of the ventral visual pathway is trained on a set of carefully-designed cartoon faces with different identities and expressions. The VisNet model architecture is composed of a hierarchical series of four Self-Organising Maps (SOMs), with associative learning in the feedforward synaptic connections between successive layers. During learning, the network develops separate clusters of cells that respond exclusively to either facial identity or facial expression. We interpret the performance of the network in terms of the learning properties of SOMs, which are able to exploit the statistical indendependence between facial identity and expression.

Highlights

  • Single unit recording studies in non-human primates have revealed that a number of the visual processing areas of the brain appear to encode facial identity and facial expression across separate subpopulations of neurons

  • It has been shown that the inferior temporal gyrus (TE) contained cells that were primarily responsive to facial identity, the adjacent superior temporal sulcus (STS) contained cells that primarily responded to facial expression, and the cells on the lip of the sulcus (TEm) tended to respond to expression and identity [1]

  • The results presented below show that the network was able to form separate localised clusters of neurons in the fourth layer which represented the two independent visual spaces, identity and expression, even though they are presented together as complete faces during training

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Single unit recording studies in non-human primates have revealed that a number of the visual processing areas of the brain appear to encode facial identity and facial expression across separate subpopulations of neurons. Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) of non-human primates contains some cells that respond exclusively to changes in facial identity, while other cells respond exclusively to facial expression [3]. Cells in lateral right fusiform cortex and pSTS were released from adaptation upon changes to facial identity, while cells in more anterior STS were released from adaptation upon changes to facial expression. These findings are consistent with other neuroimaging studies, including [6,7,8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call