Abstract

Recent studies have shown that members of superordinate concepts share less features than members of basic-level concepts. An artificial neural network model was implemented to evaluate whether feature sharedness could distinguish between these two types of concepts and whether lesioning the network would particularly affect less shared features and superordinate categorization. The model was successful in the semantic categorization test, supporting the idea that superordinate and basic-level concepts can be distinguished on the basis of feature sharedness. In contrast, lesion results proved that the model structure was not adequate to evaluate the relation between feature sharedness, processing requirements, and patient performance. Limitations and future directions for modeling semantic memory and for semantic computing are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.