Abstract

In this paper, a new computational framework is presented for the analysis of nonlinear beam finite elements subjected to large strains. Specifically, the methodology recently introduced in Bonet et al. (Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:1061---1094, 2015) in the context of three dimensional polyconvex elasticity is extended to the geometrically exact beam model of Simo (Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 49:55---70, 1985), the starting point of so many other finite element beam type formulations. This new variational framework can be viewed as a continuum degenerate formulation which, moreover, is enhanced by three key novelties. First, in order to facilitate the implementation of the sophisticated polyconvex constitutive laws particularly associated with beams undergoing large strains, a novel tensor cross product algebra by Bonet et al. (Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:1061---1094, 2015) is adopted, leading to an elegant and physically meaningful representation of an otherwise complex computational framework. Second, the paper shows how the novel algebra facilitates the re-expression of any invariant of the deformation gradient, its cofactor and its determinant in terms of the classical beam strain measures. The latter being very useful whenever a classical beam implementation is preferred. This is particularised for the case of a Mooney---Rivlin model although the technique can be straightforwardly generalised to other more complex isotropic and anisotropic polyconvex models. Third, the connection between the two most accepted restrictions for the definition of constitutive models in three dimensional elasticity and beams is shown, bridging the gap between the continuum and its degenerate beam description. This is carried out via a novel insightful representation of the tangent operator.

Highlights

  • Most classical beam theories [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] are based on the definition of so called beam strain measures, namely the axial-shear and torsional–bending strain vectors

  • The present manuscript aims to extend the variational and computational framework recently introduced in Bonet et al [12] in the context of three dimensional elasticity to the geometrically exact Simo [13] beam model, the starting point of so many other finite element beam type formulations [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

  • Formulae (38) for the representation of the deformation gradient tensor F are very useful in the context of geometrically exact beam models when the strain energy functional is defined in terms of the classical beam strain measures {, K } [1,3,41]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most classical beam theories [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8] are based on the definition of so called beam strain measures, namely the axial-shear and torsional–bending strain vectors. Pioneered in [29] and [12,32,33], an alternative framework is proposed based on maintaining as independent variables the extended kinematic set on which the strain energy is expressed as a convex function, namely, the deformation gradient, its cofactor and its determinant. In this paper, the latter approach is particularised for a degenerate beam description.

Continuum kinematics
Polyconvex elasticity
A polyconvex constitutive model
A non-polyconvex constitutive model
Continuum degenerate polyconvex beam formulation
Beam kinematics
Linearisation of the beam kinematics
Transition from polyconvex continuum model to polyconvex beam theory
Polyconvex co-rotational beam formulation
The classical beam strain measures
Relationship with the classical beam formulation
Polyconvex beam theory
Convexity in terms of the strain vector B
Polyconvexity in terms of the beam strain measures and K
Relationship between tangent elasticity operators
Polyconvex constitutive models in classical beam theory
A Mooney–Rivlin constitutive model
A Saint-Venant constitutive model
Variational formulation
Finite element discretisation
Discretisation of linearisations
Numerical examples
Bending test
Beam with slope discontinuity with zero Poisson ratio
Constrained torsion–compression example: coercivity of the models
Static twisting column
Dynamic twisting column
Findings
Concluding remarks
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.