Abstract

Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The stenotic coronary vessels are generally treated with coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs), which can be either arterial (internal mammary artery, radial artery) or venous (saphenous vein). However, the different mechanical properties of the graft can influence the outcome of the procedure in terms of risk of restenosis and subsequent graft failure. In this paper, we perform a computational fluid–structure interaction (FSI) analysis of patient-specific multiple CABGs (Y-grafts) with the aim of better understanding the influence of the choice of bypass (arterial vs venous) on the risk of graft failure. Our results show that the use of a venous bypass results in a more disturbed flow field at the anastomosis and in higher stresses in the vessel wall with respect to the arterial one. This could explain the better long-term patency of the arterial bypasses experienced in the clinical practice.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.