A computational and experimental comparison of two outlet stators for the Nimbus LVAD. Left ventricular assist device.

Abstract

Two designs of an outlet stator for the Nimbus axial flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are analyzed at nominal operating conditions. The original stator assembly (Design 1) has significant flow separation and reversal. A second stator assembly (Design 2) replaces the original tubular outer housing with a converging-diverging throat section with the intention of locally improving the fluid dynamics. Both stator designs are analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis and experimental particle imaging flow visualization (PIFV). The computational and experimental methods indicate: 1) persistent regions of flow separation in Design 1 and improved fluid dynamics in Design 2; 2) blade-toblade velocity fields that are well organized at the blade tip yet chaotic at the blade hub for both designs; and 3) a moderate decrease in pressure recovery for Design 2 as compared with Design 1. The CFD analysis provides the necessary insight to identify a subtle, localized flow acceleration responsible for the decreased hydraulic efficiency of Design 2. In addition, the curiously low thrombogenicity of Design 1 is explained by the existence of a three-dimensional unsteady vortical flow structure that enhances boundary advection.