A comprehensive review of energy consumption of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants

Orders & Contracts

Operation of the RO Kinetic ® energy recovery system: Description and real experiences

Retrofits to improve desalination plants

Determination of optimal design factors and operating conditions in a large-scale seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant

Waste energy recovery in seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants. Part 1: Review

Analysis of the influence of the configuration in ERD retrofit in two-stage SWRO trains

SWRO process simulator

Performance model for reverse osmosis

Reverse osmosis (RO) technology requires high energy input in order to extract freshwater from seawater. Improvements in RO technology have led to seawater RO (SWRO) becoming the dominant form of large scale desalination around the world. However, the specific energy consumption (SEC) of SWRO remains substantially higher than that for surface water treatment and indirect potable recycling, making SWRO less cost effective than other alternatives for producing potable water. Furthermore, where non-renewable energy sources are used to supply SWRO energy demand, higher levels of greenhouse gas are emitted compared with lower energy alternatives. The purpose of this paper is to review the RO process configurations currently available and their impact on reducing SWRO energy consumption. This paper highlights the main factors contributing to SWRO energy consumption and presents some of the commonly adopted approaches to reducing SEC in SWRO plants. The use of energy recovery devices (ERDs) in SWRO is explored and the relative effectiveness of the various types of ERDs in reducing SEC presented.

Energy optimisation of existing SWRO (seawater reverse osmosis) plants with ERT (energy recovery turbines): Technical and thermoeconomic assessment

Objectives The production cost of reverse osmosis (RO) seawater desalination plant is determined by the CAPEX (Capital expenditure) and OPEX (Operating expenditure). In detail, CAPEX and OPEX are composed of direct cost, overhead cost, electricity cost, and other O&M costs. However, CAPEX and OPEX may vary by country and region. Therefore, this study tries to estimate the production cost by calculating the construction and maintenance costs depending on production capacities based on the operation results such as TDS concentration and the energy consumption from a seawater desalination plant in Korea. Methods A two-stage RO based seawater desalination plant with a capacity of 10 MIGD (45,000 m3/d) was used in this study. The plant consists of a 2 MIGD (9,000 m3/d) unit having DABF (Dissolved air bio-ball filter) and UF (Ultrafiltration) as pretreatment processes, and another 8 MIGD (36,000 m3/d) unit having DABF and DMF (Dual media filtration) as pretreatment processes. To estimate the production cost, construction and maintenance costs were calculated by using GWI's Desaldata cost estimator. CAPEX (Capital expenditure) was calculated based on production capacity, recovery rate, TDS concentration and temperature of seawater, while OPEX (Operating expenditure) was calculated based on production capacity, country, energy consumption, and electricity unit price. Results and Discussion The energy consumptions from EMS (Energy Management System) were 5.48 kWh/m3 at SLC (9,000 m3/d) and 3.4 kWh/m3 at MLC (45,000 m3/d), respectively. In the CAPEX, MLC was reduced by 395,954 ￦/m3 compared to SLC, and the LLC was lower by 192,019 ￦/m3 than MLC. Overall, CAPEX decreased as the production capacity increased. The CAPEX of small plants with production capacity between 10,000 and 50,000 m3/d was significantly different; however, there was no significant difference in larger plants having a capacity above 100,000 m3/d. The OPEX for the annual production capacity showed a sizable difference with 742.3 ￦/m3, 636.5 ￦/m3 and 580.3 ￦/m3 for SLC, MLC, and LLC, respectively. The electricity cost was a substantial portion of OPEX. Also, the production costs based on the interest rates (3% and 5%) were 1,326-1,384 ￦/m3, 1,163-1,209 ￦/m3, and 1,023-1,070 ￦/m3 for SLC, MLC, and LLC, respectively. The results were consistent with 1.0 US$/m3, which is the average production costs presented from other references. Conclusions The production cost estimated using the Desaldata cost estimator based on the CAPEX and OPEX tends to decrease as the capacity increases. However, when the capacity increased over 50,000 m3/d, the production cost decreased by an average of 40 ￦/m3. Thus the decrement of production cost reduced. From these results, the production cost of tap water through seawater desalination was estimated between 1,023 ￦/m3 and 1,070 ￦/m3 above 100,000 m3/d. Therefore, it is difficult to introduce a large-scale desalination plant in Korea, because the average tap water price was 834.6 ￦ in Korea in 2017. However, It is expected that the seawater desalination will be introduced as an alternative water source whenever drinking water price rises, or when the quantity of available drinking water sources reduce due to climate change and water pollution, or whenever energy consumption is reduced as a result of the steady development of the component technologies such as the reverse osmosis membrane, high-pressure pump, and energy recovery device. Key words: Reverse osmosis seawater desalination plant, Water price, Capital expenditure, Operating expenditure, Energy consumption

In Republic of Korea, seawater engineering and architecture of high efficiency reverse osmosis (SEAHERO) research and development (R&D) program started from 2007 to lead the top seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) plant technologies for desalination with the fund of US $165 million for 6 years including test-bed plant construction. There are three technical strategies for SEAHERO R&D program called 3L, which represents large scale, low fouling, and low energy, respectively. Large scale means design, construction, and operation of the largest unit SWRO train [daily water production rate = 8 MIGD (36,000 m3/day)] in the world. Low-fouling strategy targets the decrease of RO membrane fouling by 50%. The specific target for low energy is total energy consumption of whole SWRO plant (including intake, pretreatment, SWRO systems, and so on) less than 4 kWh/m3. The core parts for SWRO plant, such as 16 in. diameter RO membrane and energy recovery device, were developed and will soon be introduced to a test-bed including the largest unit SWRO train. The next step of SEAHERO is real field scale test-bed application of the unit technologies developed for the past 4 years (2007–2010) such as strategic pretreatment, energy-saving technology, and reliable system monitoring.

Influence of site-specific parameters on environmental impacts of desalination

Various bacterial growth potential (BGP) methods have been developed recently to monitor biofouling in seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) systems such as assimilable organic carbon and bacterial regrowth potential. However, the relationship between these methods and biofouling in SWRO desalination plants has not yet been demonstrated. In this research, an attempt is made to investigate if a correlation exists between BGP of SWRO feed water and the chemical cleaning frequency in SWRO plants using an ATP-based BGP method employing an indigenous microbial consortium. Using ATP-based BGP method at 5 different seawater locations showed low variations of bacterial yield.The BGP method was applied to assess the pretreatment performance of three full-scale SWRO plants with different pretreatment processes. Dual media filtration (DMF) showed the highest BGP removal (>50%) in two SWRO plants. Removal of BGP and hydrophilic organic carbon in dissolved air floatation combined with ultrafiltration was similar to the removal achieved with DMF in combination with inline coagulation. For the three SWRO plants investigated, a higher BGP in SWRO feed water corresponded to a higher chemical cleaning frequency. However, more data is required to confirm if a real correlation exists between BGP and biofouling in SWRO plants.

Seawater reverse osmosis with isobaric energy recovery devices