Abstract

Geothermal energy systems can help in achieving an environmentally friendly and more efficient energy utilization, as well as enhanced power generation and building heating/cooling, thereby making energy systems more sustainable. The role of the backfill material, which fills the space between a pipe and the surrounding soil, is important in the operation of ground heat exchangers. Among the review articles on parameters affecting ground heat exchanger performance published over the past eight years, only two discuss types of backfill materials, even though the importance of these materials is significant. However, no review has yet been published exclusively on the kinds of backfill materials used in ground heat exchangers. This article addresses this need by providing a comprehensive review of a variety of types of backfill materials and their effects on ground heat exchanger performance. For organizational purposes, the backfill materials are divided into two categories: conventional backfill materials (pure and mixed materials) and modern backfill materials (improved phase change materials). Both categories are described in detail. It is shown that bentonite has been used considerably as a conventional backfill material in ground heat exchangers, followed by silica sand and coarse/fine sand. Moreover, acid and shape-stabilized phase change materials have been applied mostly as modern backfill materials in ground heat exchangers. It is observed, generally, that conventional backfill materials are used more than modern backfill materials in ground heat exchangers. It should be noted that the data covered in this study are not from all the articles published in the last eight years, but rather from a subset based on specific criteria (i.e., English-language papers published in reputable journals). These articles were published by authors from numerous countries. The results may, as a consequence, have some corresponding limitations, but these are likely to be minor.

Highlights

  • A sustainable supply of energy resources is needed to move towards and achieve sustainable development

  • The results show that the thermal conductivity of backfill material containing graphite is much higher than that for the pure material

  • The results indicated that the heat pump coefficient of performance (COP) increased through the use of phase change materials (PCMs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The benefits of combining PCMs and GSHPs has attracted a great deal of attention. By using a PCM as a backfill material, it is possible to reduce the temperature variation in the surrounding soil, which effectively reduces the need for ground and borehole space. These results were verified by Weibo et al [49]. Among the advantages of using PCMs as backfill materials in GSHP systems, having a small thermal radius as well as a constant temperature during phase change results in reducing the distances between multiple GHEs in one area. In order to avoid the consequences of leaking PCMs, two methods were recently developed, including the use of the microencapsulation of PCMs and fostering PCM reactions with other materials such as silica and polyethylene to produce shape-stabilized PCMs (SSPCMs)

Conventional Backfill Materials
Mixed Materials
Findings
Improved PCMs as Backfill Materials
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call