Abstract

Several passive techniques can substantially improve the heat transfer performance of conventional heat exchangers. Passive methods persistently use heat transfer augmentation inside tubular sections, which tackle dominant thermal resistance. The thermal resistance in turbulent flow is primarily due to a thin viscous sublayer near the tube wall. This proliferates into the cross-section of the conduit in the case of laminar flows due to the existence of a relatively thicker boundary layer. This urges disturbance in the entire fluid throughout the cross-section in laminar flows, whereas augmentation devices are usually located close to the wall for turbulent flows. Most of these methods yield increased fluid residence time within the system by inducing swirling motion. The form of disturbance in the flow field is the characteristic of the passive technique used to prolong the fluid residence time and is exhibited differently in both flow regimes. The present article showcases a comprehensive review of heat transfer enhancement through thermo hydraulic performance assessment of these methods reported in the literature. The comparison is based on ratios of Nusselt numbers, first at the same Reynolds numbers, and then, at equal pumping power with constant heat transfer area.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call