Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThe United States has experienced substantial shifts in its population dynamics due to an aging population and increasing obesity rates. Nonetheless, there is limited data about the interplay between the triad of frailty, aging, and obesity. PURPOSETo investigate discriminative thresholds and independent associations of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), Modified Frailty Index-5 (mFI-5), and greater patient age. STUDY DESIGNAn observational retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLEWe analyzed 49,754 spine surgery patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020. OUTCOME MEASUREA total of 30-day postoperative mortality. METHODSUsing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and multivariable (odds ratios [OR] and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) analyses, we compared the discriminative thresholds and independent associations of RAI, mFI-5, and greater patient age in elderly obese patients who underwent spine surgery. RESULTSThere were 49,754 spine surgery patients, with a median age of 71 years (IQR: 68–75), largely white (82.6%) and male (51.9%). The ROC analysis for 30-day postoperative mortality demonstrated superior discrimination for RAI (C–statistic 0.779, 95%CI 0.54–0.805) compared to mFI-5 (C–statistic 0.623, 95% CI 0.594–0.651) and greater patient age (C–statistic 0.627, 95% CI 0.598–0.656). Multivariable analyses revealed a dose–dependent association and a larger effect magnitude for RAI: frail patients OR: 19.52 (95% CI 18.29–20.82) and very frail patients OR: 65.81 (95% CI 62.32–69.50). A similar trend was observed in the interaction evaluating RAI–age–obesity (p<.001). CONCLUSIONOur study highlights a strong association between frailty and 30-day postoperative mortality in elderly obese spine patients, revealing a dose–dependent relationship. The RAI has superior discrimination than the mFI-5 and greater patient age in predicting 30-day postoperative mortality after spine surgery. Using the RAI in preoperative assessments may improve outcomes and help healthcare providers effectively communicate accurate surgical risks and potential benefits, set realistic recovery expectations, and enhances patient satisfaction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call