Abstract

Although the M=w8.7, 1950 Assam earthquake endures as the largest continental earthquake ever recorded, its exact source and mechanism remain contentious. In this paper, we jointly analyze the spatial distributions of reappraised aftershocks and landslides, and provide new field evidence for its hitherto unknown surface rupture extent along the Mishmi and Abor Hills. Within both mountain fronts, relocated aftershocks and fresh landslide scars spread over an area of ≈330 km by 100 km. The former are more abundant in the Abor Hills while the later mostly affect the front of the Mishmi Hills. We found steep seismic scarps cutting across fluvial deposits and bounding recently uplifted terraces, some of which less than two thousand years or even a couple centuries old, at several sites along both mountain fronts. They likely attest to a minimum 200 km-long 1950 surface rupture on both the Mishmi and Main Himalayan Frontal Thrusts (MT and MFT, respectively), crossing the East Himalayan Syntaxis. At two key sites (Wakro and Pasighat), co-seismic surface throw appears to have been over twice as large on the MT as on the MFT (7.6 ± 0.2 m vs. >2.6 ± 0.1 m), in keeping with the relative, average mountain heights (3200 m vs. 1400 m), mapped landslide scar numbers (182 vs. 96), and average thrust dips (25–28° vs. 13–15°) consistent with relocated aftershocks depths. Corresponding average slip amounts at depth would have been ≈17 and ≈11 m on the MT and MFT, respectively, while surface slip at Wakro might have reached ≈34 m. Note that this amount of superficial slip would be out of reach using classic paleo-seismological trenching to reconstruct paleo-earthquake history. Most of the 1950 first arrivals fit with a composite focal mechanism co-involving the two shallow-dipping thrust planes. Their intersection lies roughly beneath the Dibang Valley, implying forced slip parallel to GPS vectors across the East Himalayan Syntaxis. Successive, near-identical, terrace uplifts at Wakro suggest near-characteristic slip during the last two surface rupturing earthquakes, while terrace boulder ages may be taken to imply bi-millennial return time for 1950-size events. As in Nepal, East-Himalayan mega-quakes are not blind and release most of the elastic, interseismic shortening that accumulates across the range.

Highlights

  • Great (Mw > 8) 19th/20th century Himalayan earthquakes were long considered blind, which made research on their exact sources and return times difficult (e.g., Yeats et al, 1992; Nakata, 1989; Ader et al, 2012)

  • The kinematically complex dual source we propose for the 1950 Assam earthquake likely accounts for the fact that its exact geometry has long been the subject of controversy

  • We find that the fault geometry derived from our field investigation along the Main Himalayan Frontal Thrust (MFT) (φ = 245◦, δ = 15◦, λ = 70◦) is compatible with the first-arrival dataset on Fig. 8D, while a source on the Mishmi Thrust (MT) (φ = 315◦, δ = 20◦, λ = 120◦) would violate the dilatational arrivals at Brisbane and Riverview, in Eastern Australia (Fig. 8E)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Great (Mw > 8) 19th/20th century Himalayan earthquakes were long considered blind, which made research on their exact sources and return times difficult (e.g., Yeats et al, 1992; Nakata, 1989; Ader et al, 2012). Our field observations and measurements of surface deformation along both the Mishmi and Abor Hills mountain fronts were combined with our reappraisal of the aftershocks and triggered landslide scars distributions to discuss an earthquake source model consistent with first-order, large-scale topographic and geodetic evidence. Aside from a few distant (likely triggered) events along the Cona/Yarlung-Zangbo graben, across the Naga Hills, north of the Po-Qu fault, and along the northwestern Sagaing fault (Fig. 1), most of the aftershocks, within their confidence ellipses, lie beneath the Abor and Mishmi ranges They are mostly located west of the relocated mainshock epicenters, all four of which are consistent with a deep rupture nucleation just west of the PoQu-Lohit fault (Fig. 1). We followed the trace of the MT southwards, northeast of the Manabhum anticline and identified sets of uplifted, abandoned terraces suggesting that recurring thrusting extends along the Upper Dihing Valley possibly as far as Vijaynagar, near the junction of the MT with the northernmost branch of the Sagaing Fault (Figs. 1 and 2, Note S4)

Quantitative measurements of 1950 and penultimate thrust offsets
Source geometry
Shallow and average co-seismic slip amounts
Dual first motion focal mechanism
Independent seismic moment estimates
Return time
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call