Abstract
A network's diagnosability is the maximum number of faulty vertices that the network can discriminate solely by performing mutual tests among vertices. The original diagnosability without any condition is often rather low because it is bounded by the network's minimum degree. The h-extra fault diagnosability is an important and widely accepted diagnostic strategy as a new measure of diagnosability, which guarantees that the scale of every component is at least h+1 in the remaining system. Moreover, it increases the allowed faulty vertices, hence enhancing the diagnosability of the network. There have been lots of state-of-the-art literatures concerning the h-extra fault diagnosability. Although there are some methods to theoretically prove the extra fault diagnosability of some other well-known networks under MM* model, these methods have some serious flaws when there exists a 4-cycle in these networks. In this article, we investigate the reason that caused the flawed results in some references, and we derive a different, broadly applicable, and complete fault tolerant method to establish the extra fault diagnosability in an n-dimensional alternating group graph AG <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</sub> under MM* model. The complete fault tolerant method adopts combinatorial properties and linearly many fault analysis to conquer the core of our proofs. Moreover, we compare the extra fault diagnosability of AG <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">n</sub> with various types of fault diagnosability, including the diagnosability, strong diagnosability, conditional diagnosability, t/k-diagnosability, and pessimistic diagnosability. It can be seen that the extra fault diagnosability is greater than all the other types of fault diagnosability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.