Abstract
The relationship between several intriguing perinatal phenomena, namely, modal, optimal, and relative birthweight and gestational age, remains poorly understood, especially the mechanism by which relative birthweight and gestational age resolve the paradox of intersecting perinatal mortality curves. Birthweight and gestational age distributions and birthweight- and gestational age-specific perinatal death rates of low- and high-risk cohorts in the United States, 2004-2015, were estimated using births-based and extended fetuses-at-risk formulations. The relationships between these births-based distributions and rates, and the first derivatives of fetuses-at-risk birth and perinatal death rates were examined in order to assess how the rate of change in fetuses-at-risk rates affects gestational age distributions and births-based perinatal death rate patterns. Modal gestational age typically exceeded optimal gestational age because both were influenced by the peak in the first derivative of the birth rate, while optimal gestational age was additionally influenced by the point at which the first derivative of the fetuses-at-risk perinatal death rate showed a sharp increase in late gestation. The clustering and correlation between modal and optimal gestational age within cohorts, the higher perinatal death rate at optimal gestational age among higher-risk cohorts, and the symmetric left-shift in births-based gestational age-specific perinatal death rates in higher-risk cohorts explained how relative gestational age resolved the paradox of intersecting perinatal mortality curves. Changes in the first derivative of the fetuses-at-risk birth and perinatal death rates underlie several births-based perinatal phenomena and this explanation further unifies the fetuses-at-risk and births-based models of perinatal death.
Highlights
Several studies have shown that population cohorts based on nationality, racial origin and other characteristics vary substantially in terms of birthweight distribution and optimal birthweight [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
Modal gestational age typically exceeded optimal gestational age because both were influenced by the peak in the first derivative of the birth rate, while optimal gestational age was influenced by the point at which the first derivative of the fetuses-at-risk perinatal death rate showed a sharp increase in late gestation
The clustering and correlation between modal and optimal gestational age within cohorts, the higher perinatal death rate at optimal gestational age among higher-risk cohorts, and the symmetric left-shift in birthsbased gestational age-specific perinatal death rates in higher-risk cohorts explained how relative gestational age resolved the paradox of intersecting perinatal mortality curves
Summary
Several studies have shown that population cohorts based on nationality, racial origin and other characteristics vary substantially in terms of birthweight distribution and optimal birthweight (i.e., the birthweight at which perinatal mortality rates are lowest) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Some support for the proposition that perinatal mortality risk is best assessed through population-specific standards of birthweight is forthcoming from the literature on the paradox of intersecting perinatal mortality curves This phenomenon was first described over 50 years ago by Yerushalmy who showed that neonatal death rates favoured the low birthweight infants of mothers who smoked (compared with the low birthweight infants of mothers who did not smoke), while the opposite was true at higher birthweights [10]. Optimal and relative gestational age perinatal death rates can be explained as a product of a decelerating birth rate (i.e., sharp declines in the first derivative) and an abrupt acceleration in the fetuses-at-risk perinatal death rate (i.e., sharp increase in the first derivative). The latter left-shift in births-based perinatal death rates of higherrisk cohorts results in the paradox of intersecting perinatal mortality curves [29,30]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
