A comparison study: Periodontal practice approach of dentists and dental hygienists.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate periodontal practice methods of dentists and dental hygienists to compare their knowledge and treatment approach in managing periodontal disease. An electronic survey was designed to assess and capture three aspects of data: (a) knowledge of periodontics; (b) practice approaches in non-surgical periodontal therapy; and (c) factors affecting clinical care. The survey was distributed to dentists and dental hygienists who graduated from the same dental school within 5years (2012-2016). Results were analysed by chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression model. Out of total 117 participants, 111 of them reported their profession (n=77 in the dental programme, n=34 in the dental hygiene programme). The results showed no statistical difference in basic periodontal knowledge between dentists and dental hygienists (P=.12). Only 13% of the surveyed population identified appropriate recall intervals for periodontal maintenance and more dental hygienists reported periodontal re-evaluations being performed within their offices compared with dentists (91% vs 70%, P=.02). Almost half of the participants who reportedly performed periodontal re-evaluations (46%) charged for the re-evaluation procedure, despite it not being covered by dental insurance. More hygienists reported beingfamiliar with and performingadjunct therapy compared to dentists in the study(P<.01). In general, dentists and hygienistsin the study were found to have similar periodontal knowledge and practice approaches. However, differences in performingperiodontal re-evaluation and adjunct therapy were significant. Further studies are needed to investigate clinical barriers that impact evidence-based periodontal care.