Abstract

BackgroundWearable trackers can help motivate you during workouts and provide information about your daily routine or fitness in combination with your smartphone without requiring potentially disruptive manual calculations or records. This paper summarizes and compares wearable fitness devices, also called “fitness trackers” or “activity trackers.” These devices are becoming increasingly popular in personal healthcare, motivating people to exercise more throughout the day without the need for lifestyle changes. The various choices in the market for wearable devices are also increasing, with customers searching for products that best suit their personal needs. Further, using a wearable device or fitness tracker can help people reach a fitness goal or finish line. Generally, companies display advertising for these kinds of products and depict them as beneficial, user friendly, and accurate. However, there are no objective research results to prove the veracity of their words. This research features subjective and objective experimental results, which reveal that some devices perform better than others.MethodsThe four most popular wristband style wearable devices currently on the market (Withings Pulse, Misfit Shine, Jawbone Up24, and Fitbit Flex) are selected and compared. The accuracy of fitness tracking is one of the key components for fitness tracking, and some devices perform better than others. This research shows subjective and objective experimental results that are used to compare the accuracy of four wearable devices in conjunction with user friendliness and satisfaction of 7 real users. In addition, this research matches the opinions between reviewers on an Internet site and those of subjects when using the device.ResultsWithings Pulse is the most friendly and satisfactory from the users’ viewpoint. It is the most accurate and repeatable for step and distance tracking, which is the most important measurement of fitness tracking, followed by Fitbit Flex, Jawbone Up24, and Misfit Shine. In contrast, Misfit Shine has the highest score for design and hardware, which is also appreciated by users.ConclusionsFrom the results of experiments on four wearable devices, it is determined that the most acceptable in terms of price and satisfaction levels is the Withings Pulse, followed by the Fitbit Flex, Jawbone Up24, and Misfit Shine.

Highlights

  • Wearable trackers can help motivate you during workouts and provide information about your daily routine or fitness in combination with your smartphone without requiring potentially disruptive manual calculations or records

  • A wearable device is a new type of technology in the form of small hardware that includes an application with tracking and monitoring fitness metrics such as distance walked or run, calories consumed, and in some devices heart rate and sleep tracking

  • This paper summarizes and compares the satisfaction, user friendliness, and accuracy of currently popular wearable devices that are found in the top ten of best 2015 fitness trackers according to reviews and comparisons [6,7,8]

Read more

Summary

Methods

Wearable devices in experiments The selection of the four wearable devices in the experiments was made randomly for wristband devices available in Korea from among the devices in the top ten review ranking [6, 7] (see Fig. 1). 1. Fitbit Flex The Fitbit Flex (Fitbit Inc., San Francisco, California, USA) is a wristband style, fitness tracking, wirelessenabled, wearable device that measures data including the number of steps walked and the quality of sleep. Fitbit Flex The Fitbit Flex (Fitbit Inc., San Francisco, California, USA) is a wristband style, fitness tracking, wirelessenabled, wearable device that measures data including the number of steps walked and the quality of sleep It can maintain stimulation and motivation for exercise and movement. 4. Jawbone The Jawbone Up24 (Jawbone, San Francisco, California, USA) is a wearable device that synchronizes wirelessly via Bluetooth, allowing users to track their sleep data, eating habits, calories burned, and daily activity, including step. The uses of all four devices for one research evaluation were tested to check and compare the accuracy of each device (the details of the experiments are explained in the following Experimental Methods)

Results
Background
Experimental methods
Section 1. The Likert scale evaluation for each device
Design
Dashboard shows the overall daily activity
Great sounding front-facing – stereo speakers
Syncing problem
Long battery life
Conclusion
17. Weebly Team
22. Weebly Team
24. Dcrainmaker
27. Weebly Team
31. Weebly Team
34. PCMac Digital Group
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call