Abstract
Power function model and linear function model were commonly used to express the relationships between stand volume and biomass. However, the relative accuracy is still unclear. In order to compare the accuracy of the two types of model, field measurement data of 279 pine forest stands in China were collected from published literatures. Using the data collected, the relationships between stand volume and aboveground biomass (AGB) ofPinus koraiensisforest,Pinus armandiiforest,Pinus massonianaforest,Pinus tabulaeformisforest andPinusforest were established. The mean relative error and mean absolute values of relative errors were employed to test the errors of the established equations. The goodness-of-fit and errors of these two types of model were compared. The results show that the power function models could generally express the relationships better than the linear function models. Also, the errors of the power function models are generally lower than those of the linear function models.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
