Abstract

With the increasing popularity among test takers and mounting acceptance from academic institutions, TOEFL iBT and IELTS are regarded and treated as equals due to similar purposes and goals. In depth, they distinguish each other in various aspects. By integrating Bachman’s framework of test method facet and Alderson’s variables of reading nature, this article formulates a comparison framework in an attempt to compare the reading parts of these two tests. The results show they share more similarities in test rubrics and input format and slightly differ from each other in score method and specification of procedures and tasks. However, substantial differences are identified in such areas as the nature of language and characteristics of tasks, which has a significant impact on test takers’ performance because TOEFL iBT reading test is more difficult in terms of readability, text types, topical features and question types, while IELTS more complex in text length and grammatical intricacy.

Highlights

  • IELTS and TOEFL iBT are two of the most widely available and accepted, the most authentic, objective and researched language proficiency tests

  • From the above comprehensive comparison, it can be seen that TOEFL iBT and IELTS reading parts have more differences than common grounds

  • With regards to characteristics of input, in TOEFL iBT, test takers are clearly instructed which paragraph the information needed for the correct response of each question item is, and which enables them to devote more time in comprehending the text instead of locating the information

Read more

Summary

A Comparison of TOEFL iBT and IELTS Reading Tests

(2018) A Comparison of TOEFL iBT and IELTS Reading Tests. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 283-309.

Introduction
Framework for Comparison
Characteristics of Input Format
Characteristics of Input Language
Characteristics of Tasks
The Comparison of the TOEFL iBT and the IELTS Reading Test Rubric
Test organization
Instructions
The Comparison of the TOEFL iBT and the IELTS Reading Test Input
Format
Social Science and Humanities
Conclusions
Findings
Background
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.