Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence techniques to wearable sensor data may facilitate accurate analysis outside of controlled laboratory settings—the holy grail for gait clinicians and sports scientists looking to bridge the lab to field divide. Using these techniques, parameters that are difficult to directly measure in-the-wild, may be predicted using surrogate lower resolution inputs. One example is the prediction of joint kinematics and kinetics based on inputs from inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. Despite increased research, there is a paucity of information examining the most suitable artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting gait kinematics and kinetics from IMUs. This paper compares the performance of three commonly employed ANNs used to predict gait kinematics and kinetics: multilayer perceptron (MLP); long short-term memory (LSTM); and convolutional neural networks (CNN). Overall high correlations between ground truth and predicted kinematic and kinetic data were found across all investigated ANNs. However, the optimal ANN should be based on the prediction task and the intended use-case application. For the prediction of joint angles, CNNs appear favourable, however these ANNs do not show an advantage over an MLP network for the prediction of joint moments. If real-time joint angle and joint moment prediction is desirable an LSTM network should be utilised.

Highlights

  • Inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors are gaining traction as a clinical gait analysis tool due to their improved accuracy, feasibility, ease-of-use, and importantly, applicability outside of the laboratory environment [1,2]

  • This paper aimed to provide insight into the performance of different artificial neural network (ANN) when applied to the task of predicting joint angles and joint moments based on acceleration and angular rate signals of the lower limbs

  • All ANNs evaluated in this study show very good overall results for the prediction of both joint kinematics and kinetics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors are gaining traction as a clinical gait analysis tool due to their improved accuracy, feasibility, ease-of-use, and importantly, applicability outside of the laboratory environment [1,2]. A meta-analysis of inertial sensor based gait analysis research concluded limited evidence in their application for determining joint kinematics, especially in non-sagittal (flexion-extension) motion [3]. A variety of methods can be adopted for this purpose, all of which are dependent on sensor fusion algorithms and determining the initial sensor-to-segment alignment via the implementation of calibration postures or functional movements that the participant must execute [5]. Acceptable levels of within- and between-participant, and within- and between-tester repeatability, can only be achieved with appropriate sensor fusion algorithm application and accurate and reliable calibration procedures [6,7,8]. The direct determination of GRFs based on Newton’s equations is challenging as their solution is indeterminate during the double support phase

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call