Abstract
ABSTRACT The compositional equation of state formulations by Coats (C), Nghiem, Fong, and Aziz (NFA), and Young and Stephenson (YS) are compared for both immiscible (IM) and multiple contact miscible (MCM) problems. Coats' formulation has the largest computer memory requirements and computation times. Nghiem, Fong, and Aziz's formulation requires the least memory, and Young and Stephenson's formulation is generally the fastest.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
