Abstract
The performance of typing group-specific component (Gc) in bloodstains by two isoelectric focusing methods followed by its detection with silver staining has been compared with an established forensic system of typing phosphoglucomutase (PGM 1) locus phenotypes by isoelectric focusing (IEF) in 1 mm gels. For Gc typing ultra-thin isoelectric focusing (UTIEF) gels and immobilized pH gradient (IPG) gels were used. Both laboratory prepared stains and casework stains were examined. The Gc UTIEF method is approximately eight times more sensitive than the existing PGM 1 1 mm IEF method for control and casework stains. However, on average, a larger amount of stain was taken from casework stains than control stains for each typing system. A total of 53 casework stains were examined. Comparable success rates of 62% and 64% were obtained for typing Gc on UTIEF gels and PGM 1 by 1 mm IEF, respectively. A success rate of 55% was obtained for typing Gc on IPGs. Bloodstains that were over 200 days old were successfully grouped by all three methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
