A comparison of the room-temperature behaviour of AISI 304LN stainless steel and Nimonic 90 under strain cycling

Abstract

Abstract The influence of room-temperature low-cycle fatigue (LCF) deformation on the microstructure and the consequent modification of the LCF behaviour were examined in the case of AISI 304LN stainless steel and the superalloy Nimonic 90. Secondary hardening due to martensite formation in AISI 304LN enhanced its resistance to plastic flow. On the other hand, in Nimonic 90 shearing of γ′ particles led to cyclic softening. A change in the number of operating slip systems as well as the fracture mode was responsible for the observed two-slope behaviour in the Coffin-Manson, the cyclic stress-strain and the energy-life plots in Nimonic 90. While Nimonic 90 resisted the applied strain elastically on the basis of its strength, AISI 304LN resisted the strain plastically on the basis of its ductility. Nimonic 90 had a much higher plastic strain energy absorption capacity than AISI 304LN.