Abstract
AbstractThis paper distinguishes between testing approach (parametric t, sign, cross‐sectional rank, and longitudinal rank) and test type (conventional, standardized, and weighted least squares). Similar tests (i.e., tests of the same type) are compared for each testing approach using constant and unequal shift models. Thus the results given here are free of confounding effects present in prior comparisons of dissimilar tests. While all the tests compared are sensitive to the underlying location shift model, if the shift is independent of the security standard deviation, then the weighted least squares longitudinal rank test is most. powerful.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
