A comparison of the perceived effects on Scottish general dental practitioners of peer review and other continuing professional development

Abstract

To produce evidence to inform future provision of continuing professional development (CPD). A postal questionnaire survey of 268 dentists who had participated in the pilot peer review scheme in Scotland. Courses, both Section 63 and privately run, were both seen as highly effective in changing both knowledge and practising behaviour. Most of the free form comments invited were positive about the effects and acceptability of peer review as a mode of CPD. Courses and reading journals were felt to be better at changing knowledge while all the other modes (vide intra) were felt to be better at changing practice, except computer assisted learning (CAL). Peer review in Scotland is perceived as an acceptable and effective CPD mode for changing knowledge and practice. It is not felt to be superior to the established classical modes of courses and reading of journals.