Abstract

Grocery stores can be an important resource for health and nutrition with the variety and economic value of foods offered. Weekly circulars are a means of promoting foods at a sale price. To date, little is known about the extent that nutritious foods are advertised and prominently placed in circulars. This study’s aim was to compare the nutritional quality of products advertised on the front page of online circulars from grocery stores in high- versus low-income neighborhoods in New York City (NYC). Circulars from grocery stores in the five highest and five lowest median household income NYC zip codes were analyzed. Nutrition information for food products was collected over a two-month period with a total of 805 products coded. The study found no significant difference between the nutritional quality of products advertised on the front page of online circulars from grocery stores in high- versus low-income neighborhoods in New York City (NYC). In both groups, almost two-thirds of the products advertised were processed, one-quarter were high in carbohydrates, and few to no products were low-sodium, high-fiber, or reduced-, low- or zero fat. Through innovative partnerships with health professionals, grocery stores are increasingly implementing in-store and online health promotion strategies. Weekly circulars can be used as a means to regularly advertise and prominently place more healthful and seasonal foods at an affordable price, particularly for populations at higher risk for nutrition-related chronic disease.

Highlights

  • Research indicates that the built environment impacts quality of health

  • We hypothesized that the grocery stores from low-income zip codes would advertise a greater number of food products that were lower in nutritional value

  • Five of the stores were located in the zip codes with the highest median income where grocery stores were present; the remaining five were present in the lowest median income zip codes

Read more

Summary

A Comparison of the Nutritional Quality of Food Products

Received: 26 November 2013; in revised form: 19 December 2013 / Accepted: 23 December 2013 /

Introduction
Sample Selection
Data Collection
Data Analysis
Results and Discussion
Comparison of Products and Nutritional Content
Conclusions
24. Sodium in
30. Lifestyle
32. CPG 2011 Year in Review
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call