Abstract
The functional status of congregate housing (Elderhouse) residents was evaluated and compared to older adults living in independent housing. Residents of both sites did not differ in their ability to perform everyday activities, as measured by the Sickness Impact Profile, but the older, better educated Elderhouse residents rated their health as better and had a slower walking pace. Results suggested that Elderhouse residents used mandatory services to maintain their level of function and independence, rather than to attain independence. The proposed resident of Elderhouse, the dysfunctional older adult, was not necessarily utilizing the semi-supportive environment. Additional factors, such as income, type of services and social image may be pertinent when designing and marketing semi-supportive environments.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
