A Comparison of the Finite-Element Method and Analytical Method for Modeling Unexploded Ordnance Using Magnetometry

Abstract

Unexploded ordnance (UXO) is military ordnance that was fired, dropped, or emplaced but failed to function as intended and thus constitutes an explosive hazard. UXO is a worldwide problem that kills or maims thousands of civilians each year. Magnetic surveys are an efficient means of locating UXO containing ferrous metal when geologic conditions are sufficiently free of magnetic soil and rock. However, discrimination of UXO from non-UXO is complicated by the fact that UXO is often associated with high levels of clutter from ordnance fragmentation. To date, magnetic modeling of UXO has been based on calculations for a simple body of revolution geometry (prolate spheroids). We conducted an investigation to show how numerical modeling, in particular, finite-element modeling of more realistic geometries, compares to prolate spheroid results. Our results show that the calculated dipole moment response for complex models resembling actual UXO is up to 50% higher than the dipole moments for the prolate spheroid model. We also found that altering the shape of a model from a prolate spheroid to a complex shape has a greater effect on dipole moment than maintaining the same shape and altering the volume. Finally, in comparing the surface response from our models to real total field magnetic data, we find that complex models more closely match actual field data than prolate spheroid models. We suggest that modeling and, ultimately, discrimination using more realistic UXO shapes could result in significant improvements in distinguishing UXO from magnetic clutter and geology.