A comparison of the efficacy of tocilizumab versus azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nervous system, which is frequently accompanied by a pathological humoral immune response against aquaporin-4 water channel. The most common feature of the disorder is recurrent episodes of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and optic neuritis. Frequent relapse leads to the gradual accumulation of neurological dysfunction. Azathioprine (AZA) is an empirical attack -preventive immunotherapies drug to prevent the relapse of NMOSD, and tocilizumab (TCZ) has been also reported reduce the activity of NMOSD. Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy between TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD patients. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the English literature between 2000 and 2022 by using relevant medical subject heading and entry terms in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases. A meta-analysis of drug efficacy was performed using expanded disability status scale score and annualized relapse rate (ARR) as the primary outcome indicators. The literature search found a total of 1546 articles about TCZ and AZA in the treatment of NMOSD, 27 of which were included in this study after a series of screening. 930 and 148 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with AZA and TCZ, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of expanded disability status scale score before and after AZA treated was -0.40 (95%CI: -0.50, -0.30) (I2 = 65.4%, P < .001), before and after TCZ treated was -0.84 (95%CI: -1.08, -0.60) (I2 = 45.6%, P = .076). The SMD of ARR before and after AZA treated was -1.01 (95%CI: -1.12, -0.90) (I2 = 83.4%, P < .001), before and after TCZ treated was -1.27 (95%CI: -1.52, -1.03) (I2 = 52.7%, P = .039). In addition, TCZ reduce ARR more significantly compared with AZA (P = .031). The results of this study showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with AZA and TCZ are associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well. In addition, compared with AZA, TCZ more significantly reduce ARR.