Abstract

Missing values cause critical problems on training a prediction model. Various missing data imputation methods have been introduced to settle down the problem. However, the imputation accuracy obtained by the methods is insufficient to validate performance of prediction models. Thus, in this study, we compare (1) imputation accuracy from various imputation methods as well as (2) the effects of imputation methods on prediction accuracy, investigating a relationship between imputation accuracy and prediction accuracy. For the comparison, we use water quality data composed of the latest actual observational multi-sensor data from Daecheong Lake. We conduct several experiments to compare seven imputation methods including a state of the art method, and their effects on three distinct prediction models. Through quantitative comparison and analysis, we proved that it is necessary to consider both imputation accuracy and model prediction accuracy when choosing an imputation method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.