Abstract

The objective of this research is the numerical implementation and comparison between the performance of the continuous and discrete adjoint Lattice Boltzmann (LB) methods in optimization problems of unsteady flow fields. For this purpose, a periodic two-dimensional incompressible channel flow affected by the constant and uniform body forces is considered as the base flow field. The standard LB method and D2Q9 model are employed to solve the flow field. Moreover, the inverse optimization of the selected flow field is defined by considering the body forces as the design variables and the sum of squared errors of flow field variables on the whole field as the cost function. In this regard, the continuous and discrete adjoint approaches extended based on the LB method are used to achieve the gradients of the cost function with respect to the design variables. Finally, the numerical results obtained from the continuous adjoint LB method are compared with the discrete one, and the accuracy and efficiency of them are discussed. In addition, the validity of the obtained cost function gradients is investigated by comparing with the results of the standard forward finite difference and complex step methods. The numerical results show that regardless of the implementation cost of the two approaches, the computational cost to evaluate the gradients in each optimization cycle for the discrete adjoint LB approach is slightly more than the other one but has a little higher convergence rate and needs a smaller number of cycles to converge. Besides, the gradients obtained from the discrete version have a better agreement with those of the complex step method. Eventually, based on the structural similarities of the continuous LB equation and its corresponding adjoint one and using the simple periodic and complete bounce-back boundary conditions for the LB equation, the improved boundary conditions for the continuous adjoint LB equation are presented. The numerical results show that the use of these boundary conditions instead of the original adjoint boundary conditions significantly improves the relative accuracy and also the convergence rate of the continuous adjoint LB method.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.