A Comparison of the Asleep-Awake Technique and Monitored Anesthesia Care During Awake Craniotomy: A 10-Year Analysis.

Abstract

Background Awake intracranial surgery with direct electrical stimulation (DES)is considered the gold standard for the resection of tumors affecting the eloquent areas of the brain. Awake craniotomy is a challenge for the anesthesiologist, as the patient's active cooperation is required throughout the operation. There are two frequent techniques, one is asleep-awake-asleep (AAA), and the other is called monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The AAA technique is the longer standing of the two and comprises general anesthesia followed by intraoperative awakening, which is necessary for neurological monitoring. In the present study, a comparison was made between the asleep-awake (AA) technique, a variation of the AAA anesthesia technique, and the MAC, which consists of a sedation that makes it possible to control pain and anxiety. Unlike the AA technique, the MAC does not involve the use of invasive airway devices. Objective The main objective was to contrast the two anesthetic management techniques for awake brain surgery used in our hospital. Methods A retrospective observational single-center study was performed consisting of a review of patient clinical records. The study sample comprised all patients above 18 years of age undergoing brain surgery through awake craniotomy between January 2013 and December 2022 at the Miguel Servet University Hospital (HUMS) in Zaragoza (Spain). Results Of the 79 patients included in the study, 39 were operated under AA anesthesia while the remaining 40 were operated under the MAC procedure. The main age of the participants was 52.8 years, the mean height was 169 cm, andthe mean weight was 74.2 kg.No statistically significant differences were observed with respect to the patients' baseline characteristics, except for obesity which was more prevalent in the MAC group.In the MAC group, the airway was managed by means of nasal cannulas in all cases, with conversion to general anesthesia being required in only one instance. In the AA group, thelaryngeal mask (LM) was used in 89.7% of the patients, and the endotracheal tube (ETT) in 10.3%. The surgical and anesthetic procedure duration was 15 and 20 minutes shorter in the MAC group, respectively. A reduction of almost 20 minutes in the anesthetic procedure and 15 minutes in the surgical one was observed.Tachycardia, desaturation, and airway complications were observed in four, five, and four patients respectively in the AA group but in none of the patients in the MAC group. The mean stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the mean postoperative hemoglobin levels between both groups were insignificant. Conclusions Both techniques analyzed in this study turned out to be equally safe and effective for brain tumor surgery in awake patients.