Abstract
ABSTRACTIdentification of human remains often depends on estimating the age at death. The most reliable age estimation methods in juveniles have been based on dental development. This study evaluated the Demirjian (DGT), Nolla, and Moorrees, Fanning and Hunt (MFH) methods in estimating age in a modern population from Sudbury, Ontario, Canada using third molars as seen in 361 clinical panoramic digital radiographs of 361 individuals. Inclusion in this study required there to be at least one developing third molar clearly present in the radiograph with a known date of birth. This yielded a sample of 179 females and 182 males with an age range from 7.9 to 29.9 years. All three methods were found to be suitable in the estimation of the chronological age using the third molar. However, the Nolla method proved to be the most applicable at estimating age based on derived polynomial regression R2 values ranging from 0.854 to 0.891.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
