A comparison of surgical resection for distal esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and proximal gastric cancers in the Memphis metropolitan area (MMA).

Abstract

147 Background: The incidence of distal esophageal (DE) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors has increased rapidly in recent decades. They are often included in gastric cancer trials. The 7th AJCC staging has reclassified tumors of the DE, GEJ, and proximal stomach (PS) as esophageal cancers. We compared the historical management of these tumors in our community. Methods: Review of all curative-intent DE, GEJ, and PS cancer resections at two healthcare institutions in the MMA from 1999-2008. Results: Seventy patients were identified (Table). Males predominated. The histology was adenocarcinoma in 48% of DE, 91% of GEJ, and 100% of PS cancers. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed in 10% of DE, 6% of GEJ, and 7% of PS patients. Neoadjuvant therapy was given to 29% of DE, 35% of GEJ and 0% of PS patients. R0 resection rates were similiar. Fewer DE and GEJ patients had up to 15 lymph nodes removed, yet lymph node metastasis was identified in 52% and 35% respectively, compared to 20% of PS patients (Table). Five-year survival rates were numerically higher in the DE and GEJ patients. Conclusions: We identified differences in DE, GEJ, and PS tumors in a community setting with respect to preoperative management and lymph node sampling. Reclassification of DE, GEJ, and PS tumors by the AJCC suggests these groups now be treated uniformly as esophageal cancers, a shift from previous management as gastric cancers. Further, prospective evaluation is needed to assess the patterns of management and outcomes in tumors of the DE, GEJ and PS. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.