A Comparison of Soil Structure Interaction Models for Dynamic Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbines

Breiffni Fitzgerald,David Igoe,Saptarshi Sarkar

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052043

Breiffni Fitzgerald, David Igoe + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052043

Copy DOI

Abstract

This paper compares the dynamic response of an OWT structure where the below ground pile-soil behaviour is modelled using (i) the conventional API ‘p-y’ approach and (ii) the ‘PISA’ approach. A nonlinear aero-elastic code is used to model the structural dynamics of the OWT and coupled to the geotechnical model. The dynamic behaviour (natural frequencies) and fatigue loads of the turbine tower and monopile are estimated and compared using both the API and PISA approaches. A limited number of load cases were considered in the dynamic analysis with varied met-ocean conditions. It was found that the stiffer springs estimated by the PISA approach reduce the mean displacement of the tower in both the fore-aft and side-to-side directions. However, the increased monopile stiffness leads to a slightly increased amplitude of oscillations, particularly in the lightly damped side-to-side direction.

Highlights

Monopiles are the most widely used foundation support system for offshore wind turbines (OWTs)
A limited number of load cases were considered in the dynamic analysis with varied met-ocean conditions
It was found that the stiffer springs estimated by the PISA approach reduce the mean displacement of the tower in both the fore-aft and side-to-side directions

Summary

Introduction

Monopiles are the most widely used foundation support system for offshore wind turbines (OWTs). More than 80% of recent offshore wind turbine installations in Europe rely on monopile support structures. The monopile diameter is often governed by dynamic lateral and rotational stiffness requirements as part of the OWT natural frequency and structural fatigue checks. Recent advances in monopile design approaches [4, 5, 6] have allowed for significant optimization of the foundation design and fatigue life of the structure, resulting in large cost savings for OWTs supported on monopiles.

Methods

Findings

Conclusion