A comparison of soft-tissue anchors in tendo achilles reattachment

Abstract

This prospective study evaluated four soft-tissue fixation modalities, used in seven different combinations, to reattach the tendo Achilles in 34 cadaveric specimens. Ultimate loads, elastic moduli, and modes of failure were evaluated by loading the specimen in a cantilevered fashion on an Instron. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to compare the failure load data for statistical significance. Although the use of two Mitek SuperAnchors showed better load resistance than one anchor (p < .01), there was no significant improvement between using two or three anchors (one anchor 116 +/- 24 N, two anchors 234 +/- 21 N, three anchors 277 +/- 80 N). Two Bionx Bankart Tacks demonstrated no significant difference over using a single tack (one tack 178 +/- 57 N, two tacks 214 +/- 86 N). No statistical difference was observed between the screw and washer systems (screw with polyacetal resin washer 307 +/- 80 N, screw with metal washer 290 +/- 81 N). Both screw and washer systems did show greater stability when compared with a single Mitek SuperAnchor (p < .01) or a single Bionx Bankart Tack (p < .05). Similar analyses using the Mann-Whitney U tests were performed on the elastic modulus data. Analysis of the displacement data among all groups showed no statistical difference. Observations of the mode of failure exhibited 86% of Mitek SuperAnchor failed secondary to suture, and 70% of the Bionx Bankart Tack and 90% of the screw and washer systems failed because of the tendon shearing around the fixation. The comparisons of cost-effectiveness among the fixations showed the Synthes screw and polyacetal resin spiked washer to have the lowest cost to load ratio ($0.15/N).