Abstract
BackgroundFull scent profiles emitted by living tissues can be screened by using total ion chromatograms generated in full scan mode and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry technique using Headspace Sorptive Extraction. This allows the identification of specific compounds and their absolute quantification or relative abundance. Quantifications ideally should be based on calibration curves using standards for each compound. However, the unpredictable composition of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and lack of standards make this approach difficult. Researchers studying scent profiles therefore concentrate on identifying specific scent footprints i.e. relative abundance rather than absolute quantities. We compared several semi-quantitative methods: external calibration curves generated in the sampling system and by liquid addition of standards to stir bars, total integrated peak area per fresh weight (FW), normalized peak area per FW, semi-quantification based on internal standard abundance, semi-quantification based on the nearest n-alkane and percentage of emission. Furthermore, we explored the usage of nearest components and single calibrators for semi-quantifications.ResultsAny of the semi-quantification methods based on a standard produced similar or even identical results compared to quantification by a true-standard for a compound, except for the method based on standard addition. Each method beholds advantages and disadvantages regarding level of accuracy, experimental variability, acceptance and retrieved quantities.ConclusionsOur data shows that, except for the method of standard addition to the biological sample, the rest of the semi-quantification methods studied give highly similar statistical results. Any of the methodologies presented here can therefore be considered as valid for scent profiling. Regarding relative proportions of VOCs, the generation of calibration curves for each compound analysed is not necessary.
Highlights
Full scent profiles emitted by living tissues can be screened by using total ion chromatograms gener‐ ated in full scan mode and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry technique using Headspace Sorptive Extraction
Our results show that sampling time needs to be taken into account when characterising Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) profiles of plant species based on HSSE
Our results indicate that dual-phase stir bars are not suitable to sample complex matrices, such as flowers, due to the high noisy background introduced (Fig. 2)
Summary
Full scent profiles emitted by living tissues can be screened by using total ion chromatograms gener‐ ated in full scan mode and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry technique using Headspace Sorptive Extraction. This allows the identification of specific compounds and their absolute quantification or relative abundance. The emission of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) is a biological feature of bacteria, fungi, plants and animals. They play a key role in interaction between individuals of the same and other species, genera and kingdoms [1,2,3]. While some of these compounds are known to have an effect over pollinator attraction, others may act as repellents [6, 7].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
