Abstract
Two methods of determining strain from the two-dimensional preferred orientation of lines by Sanderson and Panozzo are compared using grain boundaries in limestones from S Ireland. The Panozzo method utilizes the orientations and lengths of lines whereas the Sanderson method uses only the orientations. The Panozzo method is shown to be more sensitive to inhomogeneous deformation or dubious data than the simpler method of Sanderson.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
