Abstract
Abstract Tornadoes produced by right-moving supercells (RMs) and quasi-linear convective systems (QLCSs) are compared across the contiguous United States for the period 2003–21, based on the maximum F/EF-scale rating per hour on a 40-km horizontal grid. The frequency of QLCS tornadoes has increased dramatically since 2003, while the frequency of RM tornadoes has decreased during that same period. The finding of prior work that the most common damage rating for QLCS tornadoes at night is EF1 persists in this larger, independent sample. A comparison of WSR-88D radar attributes between RM and QLCS tornadoes shows no appreciable differences between EF0 tornadoes produced by either convective mode. Differences become apparent for EF1–2 tornadoes, where rotational velocity is larger and velocity couplet diameter is smaller for RM tornadoes compared to QLCS tornadoes. The frequency of tornadic debris signatures (TDSs) in dual-polarization data is also larger for EF1–2 RM tornadoes when controlling for tornadoes sampled relatively close to the radar sites and in those occurring during daylight versus overnight. The weaker rotational velocities, broader velocity couplet diameters, and lower frequencies of TDSs both close to the radar and at night for QLCS EF1 tornadoes suggest that a combination of inadequate radar sampling and occasional misclassification of wind damage may be responsible for the irregularities in the historical record of QLCS tornado reports. Significance Statement A comparison of radar attributes between tornadoes with right-moving supercells and squall-line mesovortices suggests some irregularities in squall-line tornado records in the contiguous United States. The irregularities appear to be the result of both inadequate radar sampling for the relatively shallow squall-line tornadoes and occasional misclassification of wind damage with the lack of other corroborating evidence, especially overnight.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.