Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose and contribution of supplementary search methods in systematic reviews is increasingly acknowledged. Numerous studies have demonstrated their potential in identifying studies or study data that would have been missed by bibliographic database searching alone.What is less certain is how supplementary search methods actually work, how they are applied, and the consequent advantages, disadvantages and resource implications of each search method.The aim of this study is to compare current practice in using supplementary search methods with methodological guidance.MethodsFour methodological handbooks in informing systematic review practice in the UK were read and audited to establish current methodological guidance.Studies evaluating the use of supplementary search methods were identified by searching five bibliographic databases. Studies were included if they (1) reported practical application of a supplementary search method (descriptive) or (2) examined the utility of a supplementary search method (analytical) or (3) identified/explored factors that impact on the utility of a supplementary method, when applied in practice.ResultsThirty-five studies were included in this review in addition to the four methodological handbooks. Studies were published between 1989 and 2016, and dates of publication of the handbooks ranged from 1994 to 2014.Five supplementary search methods were reviewed: contacting study authors, citation chasing, handsearching, searching trial registers and web searching.ConclusionsThere is reasonable consistency between recommended best practice (handbooks) and current practice (methodological studies) as it relates to the application of supplementary search methods.The methodological studies provide useful information on the effectiveness of the supplementary search methods, often seeking to evaluate aspects of the method to improve effectiveness or efficiency. In this way, the studies advance the understanding of the supplementary search methods. Further research is required, however, so that a rational choice can be made about which supplementary search strategies should be used, and when.

Highlights

  • The purpose and contribution of supplementary search methods in systematic reviews is increasingly acknowledged

  • Numerous studies have demonstrated their potential in identifying studies or study data that would have been missed by bibliographic database searching alone [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]

  • In order to compare the existing handbook guidance to current practice, we identified studies that describe and/or evaluate how these methods are applied in practice

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The purpose and contribution of supplementary search methods in systematic reviews is increasingly acknowledged. What is less certain is how supplementary search methods work, how they are applied, and the consequent advantages, disadvantages and resource implications of each search method. The aim of this study is to compare current practice in using supplementary search methods with methodological guidance. The methodological handbooks for systematic review methodology, such as The Cochrane or CRD Handbooks, provide practical ( limited) instruction on how to undertake each supplementary search method, and empirical studies have evaluated the effectiveness and efficiencies of these search methods. What is perhaps less certain is how supplementary search methods work, and what the advantages, disadvantages and resource implications of each search method are. Study aim The aim of this study is to compare empirical studies of supplementary search techniques to the recommendations in methodological handbooks

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.