Abstract
Abstract Build orientation in additive manufacturing technology is a pre-process application that affects many parameters, such as the volume of the support structure, part quality, build time, and cost. Determining the optimum build orientation for one or more objectives for complex parts is an error-prone puzzle. This study evaluates the behavior of cuckoo search algorithm, differential evolution, firefly algorithm, genetic algorithm, gray wolf optimizer, Harris hawks optimization, jaya algorithm, moth flame optimizer, multi-verse optimizer, particle swarm optimization, A Sine cosine algorithm, salp swarm algorithm, and whale optimization algorithm to determine the optimum build orientation of the component to be manufactured additively. The efficiency of these algorithms is evaluated on the build orientation problem of two complex components considering undercut area and build height as objective functions. Thus, the feasibility of these algorithms for real-world additive manufacturing problems is revealed. According to results obtained from the extensive analysis, the cuckoo search algorithm is the best alternative for minimizing undercut area, considering its robustness. However, the required time to solve the problem is as much as almost twice that of other algorithms. The firefly algorithm and particle swarm optimization algorithm are the best alternatives for minimizing build height.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.