A comparison of radiographic techniques with special reference to dosage.

Abstract

A Comparison of Radiographic Techniques with Special Reference to DosageG. M. Ardran and H. E. CrooksG. M. ArdranMedical Division, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, HarwellSearch for more papers by this author and H. E. CrooksMedical Division, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, HarwellSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:28 Jan 2014https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-26-307-352SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail AboutAbstractRadiographic techniques are described which produce films of satisfactory quality with considerably reduced radiation dose to the patient. These techniques are compared with those generally used. Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byOrgan Doses from Chest Radiographs in Tuberculosis Patients in Canada and Their Uncertainties in Periods from 1930 to 19695 December 2020 | Health Physics, Vol. 119, No. 2Trends in Estimated Thyroid, Salivary Gland, Brain, and Eye Lens Doses From Intraoral Dental Radiography Over Seven Decades (1940 TO 2009)20 December 2019 | Health Physics, Vol. 118, No. 2The skin dose of pelvic radiographs since 189629 March 2019 | Insights into Imaging, Vol. 10, No. 1Chest X-ray screening examinations among French uranium miners: exposure estimation and impact on radon-associated lung cancer risk23 June 2014 | Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 71, No. 9The distribution of medical X-ray doses amongst individuals in the British populationD. Hart and J. C. Le Heron13 February 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 65, No. 779Brain and Salivary Gland Tumors Related to Prior Dental Radiography: Implications for Current PracticeThe Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 120, No. 2Injury to the spleenInjury, Vol. 3, No. 2Developments in diagnostic dosimetryClinical Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 1Cancer: Relation of Prenatal Radiation to Development of the Disease in ChildhoodScience, Vol. 140, No. 3571How Does Radiation Cause Cancer?Nuclear Information, Vol. 5, No. 7List of tables and figuresAnnals of the ICRP/ICRP Publication, Vol. 3, No. 1List of tables and figures1 January 1960 | Annals of the ICRP/ICRP Publication, Vol. OS_3, No. 1Observations on the Dose from Dental X-ray Procedures with a Note on Radiography of the Nasal BonesG. M. Ardran and H. E. Crooks28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 32, No. 381Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Revised December 1954Annals of the ICRP/ICRP Publication, Vol. 1, No. 1Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Revised December 19541 January 1959 | Annals of the ICRP/ICRP Publication, Vol. OS_1, No. 1THE CONTRIBUTION TO THE GENE MATERIAL OF THE POPULATION FROM THE MEDICAL USE OF IONIZING RADIATIONS1 July 1958 | Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 2, No. 3Dose Reduction in Diagnostic Radiology*G. M. Ardran28 January 2014 | The British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 30, No. 356The Effect of Morphine Sulfate on Gastric Motility. Some Radiologic Observations in ManGastroenterology, Vol. 32, No. 1THE CLOSURE OF THE FEMALE URETHRABJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 63, No. 1Genetic Radiation Exposures in the Field of Medicine15 September 2015 | Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 12, No. 1 Volume 26, Issue 307July 1953Pages: 329-384 © The British Institute of Radiology History AcceptedApril 01,1953Published onlineJanuary 28,2014 Metrics Download PDF