Abstract
Abstract We compared survey techniques for estimating relative and absolute abundances of swift foxes (Vulpes velox) in New Mexico. For relative abundance surveys, the most efficient technique is collection of scats followed by verification of species depositing scats with DNA analysis. By collecting scats, the proportions of individual locations where swift foxes were detected were 61.9% and 67.7% during surveys in 2000 and 2001, which were greater than the proportions using scent stations (31.4%, 47.1%) or trapping (11.5%, 8.4%). By collecting scats, we detected swift foxes in 100% of the fox home ranges within the study area. If scent-station surveys are used instead, scent-station transects consisting of stations spaced at 1.6 km (1.0 mile) intervals and operated for three nights are the most practical. Searching for tracks, spotlighting and calling are much less efficient techniques. For absolute abundance surveys, trapping and resighting with cameras at bait stations was more accurate than counting ...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
