Abstract

Six photosynthesis-dependent stomatal models were tested and compared against twig cuvette gas exchange data for adult common beech ( Fagus sylvatica L.). The models differed in the use of (1) either leaf surface CO 2 concentration ( C s) or leaf intercellular CO 2 concentration ( C i), and of (2) either measured environmental humidity variables or a crudely calculated leaf water potential to simulate the effect of drought stress on stomatal conductance. The models applying C s performed slightly better than the models applying C i. The models based on environmental humidity variables performed distinctly better than the models applying a calculated leaf water potential. Several explanations for the observed performance differences between models applying C s or C i were brought forward and discussed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.