A comparison of outcomes following total and selective peritonectomy performed at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer – A study by INDEPSO

Abstract

ObjectivesTo compare clinical outcomes following total and selective peritonectomy performed during interval cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for stage IIIC/IVA serous epithelial ovarian cancer. MethodsIn this retrospective study, extent of peritonectomy was classified as total parietal peritonectomy (TPP) which comprised of removal of the entire parietal peritoneum and the greater and lesser omenta or selective parietal peritonectomy (SPP) that included 1/>1 of parietal peritonectomies performed to resect sites of residual disease. A comparison of patient and disease characteristics, morbidity, mortality and survival outcomes between the two groups was made. ResultsFrom January 2013 to December 2017, 79 patients underwent CRS (TPP-30, SPP-49) with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC). The median PCI was 14 for TPP and 8 for SPP. The 90-day grade 3–4 morbidity (23.3% for TPP, 14.2% for SPP, p = 0.58) the 90-day mortality was similar (p = 0.58). The median disease free survival (DFS) was 37 months for SPP and 33 months for TPP (p = 0.47) and median overall survival (OS) not reached for both. The 3-year OS was 95% for TPP and 70.8% for SPP (p = 0.06). The only independent predictor of OS was grade 3–4 morbidity (p = 0.01) and not TPP (p = 0.09). Microscopic residual disease was seen in 23.3% with normal looking peritoneum in TPP group. ConclusionsTPP was not associated with increased morbidity compared to SPP. There was a trend towards a longer OS in the TPP group and the finding of residual disease in ‘normal looking’ peritoneum’ warrants prospective evaluation of the benefit of TPP in this setting.