A comparison of orbital-resolution, Late Pleistocene Alkenone and foraminiferal assemblage-based sea surface temperature reconstructions from the Southwest Pacific

Abstract

Global and regional reconstructions of past climate conditions often incorporate sea surface temperature (SST) estimates from multiple proxies because not every paleotemperature proxy is applicable in all geographic locations. This practice of assimilating estimates from different proxies in global or regional temperature syntheses makes the implicit assumption that estimates derived from different proxies can be meaningfully intercompared. However, evidence to support the validity of this assumption is limited. Using paleotemperature data from sediments collected from ODP Site 1125 in the Southwest Pacific, we conduct a ∼1 Myr, orbital-scale SST proxy comparison of a recently published alkenone-derived SST record with a previously published foraminiferal assemblage-based SST record. These alkenone and foraminiferal assemblage SST datasets show strong structural similarity and yield remarkably similar estimates for basic climate metrics, including mean, median, standard deviation, and range. Statistical analysis indicates that the correlation between the two SST records is highly significant. In the spectral domain, the records share the same dominant 100 kyr beat, are coherent and in phase with each other at this frequency, and have the same coherence and phase relationship with benthic foraminiferal δ18O. Results from this work demonstrate that these two proxies would yield very similar estimates for the paleoclimate metrics most commonly used in empirical paleoclimate reconstructions that seek to document the evolution of climate over this interval. However, significant disparities between SST estimates derived from the two proxies exist for some time periods, particularly during glacial and interglacial extrema. This comparison suggests that treating estimates from these proxies as equivalent in studies that focus on short time windows (e.g. a few thousand to tens-of-thousands of years), particularly in investigations that seek to characterize glacial or interglacial extrema, could be potentially problematic. However, the sensitive location of Site 1125, just north of the Subtropical Front, likely accentuates the difference between temperature estimates from these proxies, which may be attenuated in other oceanographic settings. We attribute the discrepancies between the two SST records to two main causes: seasonal leakages of cold water across the Subtropical Front during glacial extrema and differential seasonality of maximum alkenone and foraminiferal production.