Abstract

Abstract. Descriptions of the ocean's role in the El Niño usually focus on equatorial Kelvin waves and the ability of such waves to change the mean thermocline depth and the sea surface temperature (SST) in the central and eastern Pacific. In contrast, starting from a study of the transport of water with temperatures greater than 28 ∘C, sufficient to trigger deep atmospheric convection, Webb (2018) found that, during the strong El Niños of 1983–1984 and 1997–1998, advection by the North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC) had a much greater impact on sea surface temperatures than processes occurring near the Equator. Webb's analysis, which supports the scheme proposed by Wyrtki (1973, 1974), made use of archived data from a high-resolution ocean model. Previously the model had been checked in a preliminary comparison against SST observations in the equatorial Pacific, but, given the contentious nature of the new analysis, the model's behaviour in key areas needs to be checked further against observations. In this paper this is done for the 1987–1988 El Niño, making use of satellite observations of SST and sea level. SST is used to check the movement of warm water near the Equator and at the latitudes of the NECC. Sea level is used to check the model results at the Equator and at 6∘ N in the North Equatorial Trough. Sea level differences between these latitudes affect the transport of the NECC, the increased transport at the start of each strong El Niño being associated with a drop in sea level at 6∘ N in the western Pacific. Later rises in sea level at the Equator increase the transport of the NECC in mid-ocean. The variability of sea level at 6∘ N is also used to compare the strength of tropical instability waves in the model and in the observations. The model showed that in a normal year these act to dilute the temperature in the core of the NECC. However their strength declined during the development of the strong El Niños, allowing the NECC to carry warm water much further than normal across the Pacific. The results of this paper should not be taken as providing proof of the hypotheses of Wyrtki (1973, 1974) or Webb (2018) but instead as a failure of a targeted study, using satellite observations, to disprove the hypotheses.

Highlights

  • Wyrtki (1973, 1974) analysed sea level time series at Pacific islands and showed that there was a correlation between the occurrence of strong El Niños and an increase in the sea level difference across the North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC)

  • The results show that the observations and model are generally in good agreement in both the magnitude and the timing, of the El Niño and of the many other features seen in the figures

  • Webb (2018) argues that it was this drop in sea level which was responsible for increasing the transport of the NECC, allowing it to carry warm surface water further east than normal and so trigger the strong El Niño

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wyrtki (1973, 1974) analysed sea level time series at Pacific islands and showed that there was a correlation between the occurrence of strong El Niños and an increase in the sea level difference across the North Equatorial Counter Current (NECC). Kelvin waves might trigger another process which heats the central and eastern Pacific, but, internal Kelvin waves can warm the deep ocean through downward advection, there is no way in which they can directly warm the surface layer This problem of the heat transport during an El Niño was investigated by Webb (2018) using archived data from a 1/12◦ global ocean model. Instead the model results showed that both the temperature and volume of water carried by the NECC increased during the period in which the El Niños were growing This resulted in water reaching the eastern Pacific with temperatures above 28 ◦C, sufficient to trigger deep atmospheric convection (Evans and Webster, 2014).

Mechanisms
Comparison with observations
Data sources and processing
Comparison of sea surface temperatures
Mixing by tropical instability eddies
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call