Abstract

A comparison was made of the occupational data reported on the death certificates of 586 men with their employment history obtained by interviews. Agreement was assessed for 19 occupational and 14 industrial categories of usual employment, with the highest levels of concordance (greater than or equal to 80%) found for agricultural, medical, and public administration activities. Between the two sources of information, there was overall agreement of 56% for usual occupation and 51% for usual industry of employment. Concordance was highest among the 68 self-respondents (usual occupation 66%; usual industry 53%). Among the 518 surrogates, spousal agreement was highest (58% for occupation and 51% for industry). For other surrogate types, agreement was 49% for both industry and occupation. Agreement varied by duration of employment and by level of education, with concordance tending to increase as length of employment and educational attainment rose. These relationships remained when examined by respondent type. Evaluation of agreement levels by age and other study subject characteristics showed little effect on concordance. Review of verbatim data from the interviews and death certificates revealed that most disagreements could be attributed to coding problems caused by vague or misleading information on the death certificates, although some disconcordance was due to uncodable and missing information in the interview history. Based on results from this and prior studies, the value of occupational data derived from death certificates in epidemiologic studies may be limited, although the addition of explicit instructions on the death certificate itself may aid in providing more useful and complete information for usual employment.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.