A Comparison of Northern Hemisphere Atmospheric Rivers Detected by a New Image-Processing Based Method and Magnitude-Thresholding Based Methods

Abstract

A majority of the existing atmospheric rivers (ARs) detection methods is based on magnitude thresholding on either the integrated water vapor (IWV) or integrated vapor transport (IVT). One disadvantage of such an approach is that the predetermined threshold does not have the flexibility to adjust to the fast changing conditions where ARs are embedded. To address this issue, a new AR detection method is derived from an image-processing algorithm that makes the detection independent of AR magnitude. In this study, we compare the North Pacific and Atlantic ARs tracked by the new detection method and two widely used magnitude thresholding methods in the present day climate. The results show considerable sensitivities of the detected AR number, shape, intensities and their accounted IVT accumulations to different methods. In many aspects, ARs detected by the new method lie between those from the two magnitude thresholding methods, but stand out with a greater number of AR tracks, longer track durations, and stronger AR-related moisture transport in the AR tracks. North Pacific and North Atlantic ARs identified by the new method account for around 100–120 × 10 3 kg/m/s IVT within the AR track regions, about 50 % more than the other two methods. This is primarily due to the fact that the new method captures the strong IVT signals more effectively.