Abstract
Planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) of the nitric oxide (NO) molecule has been widely used in wind tunnel facilities for flow visualization, velocity, and temperature measurements. The experimental PLIF measurements are often compared with synthetic PLIF images using computationally derived temperatures, pressures, velocities, and species mole fractions. This approach is commonly referred to as computational flow imaging (CFI). In the present work, we compare signal intensity from PLIF models with experimental PLIF measurements obtained within a low pressure gas cell system at pressures and NO mole fractions relevant to supersonic and hypersonic flowfields. Experimental measurements were compared to several different laser induced-fluorescence models reported in the literature including LIFBASE, LINUS, and a NASA two-level model. The experimental measurements agreed well with all of the models at lower pressures and lower NO mole fractions; the fluorescence there is linear with both of these parameters. However, at higher pressures and mole fractions, the signal becomes nonlinear with respect to these parameters as self-quenching limits the signal and absorption further limits the signal. In fact, for the experimental path length of the experiment, the combination of high pressure and high NO mole fraction causes the experimental results to deviate significantly from the predicted results that neglect absorption of the incident laser sheet. The LINUS model, which allows absorption to be calculated, provided results that agreed better with the experimental measurements. Since supersonic and hypersonic flowfields may contain a region of the flow with high pressures and measurements in large-scale facilities often include a long path length, neglecting absorption may have a significantly negative effect on the CFI comparison to experimental PLIF images. As a result, PLIF models that account for absorption should be included in computational flow imaging approaches for laser-induced fluorescence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.