Abstract
AbstractWe compare the empirical performance of the Fama and French (2015) five‐factor model, the Hou et al. (2015) q‐factor model, and their variations in the Korean stock market. Among the models considered, we demonstrate that the adjusted five‐factor model, which includes the quarterly‐ rather than the yearly‐based profitability factor, best explains the size‐, value‐, investment‐, and profitability‐sorted portfolio returns. We also document supporting evidence that high‐minus‐low (HML) may not be a redundant factor in the existence of q‐factors. The adjusted five‐factor model outperforms the other factor models in digesting various anomalies in the Korean market.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
