A comparison of moderate and high spatial resolution satellite data for modeling gross primary production and transpiration of native prairie, alfalfa, and winter wheat

Abstract

Although agroecosystems have a significant potential to offset carbon dioxide (CO2), the amount of CO2 captured can vary significantly depending on management practices. Accurate estimation of gross primary production (GPP) and transpiration (T) of agroecosystems at the field scale are essential for the study of food security and water resource management. To date, the carbon and water fluxes data products for commercial agroecosystems are limited, mostly at the moderate spatial resolution (MSR, hundreds of meters), which cannot be used to assess the temporal dynamics of GPP and T at the field scale. This study used the vegetation photosynthesis model (VPM) and vegetation transpiration model (VTM) to estimate field-level daily GPP (GPPVPM) and T (TVTM), respectively, in native prairie, alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in central Oklahoma, USA. We evaluated the reliability and advantages of vegetation indices (enhanced vegetation index, EVI and land surface water index, LSWI) in monitoring the land surface phenology using moderate spatial resolution data from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and high spatial resolution (HSR, tens of meters) data from Landsat and Sentinel-2. The accuracy of GPPVPM and TVTM estimates at different spatial scales was evaluated using GPP (GPPEC) and evapotranspiration (ETEC) from the eddy flux tower sites, respectively. Results demonstrate the capacity of VPM and VTM to estimate the field-level carbon and water flux dynamics and their responses to weather conditions. The use of HSR vegetation indices helped to address certain challenges faced by MSR indices, especially in capturing the crop phenology in smaller areas with conservation measures or disturbances. The findings highlight the importance of using HSR GPP estimates to reduce uncertainty in quantifying CO2 fluxes for croplands and grasslands. The findings also demonstrate the ability of the models to track field-level vegetation phenology, carbon uptake, and water use in agroecosystems under different management practices.