Abstract
Some rational decision theorists argue that moral considerations would introduce inefficiency to investment decisions. However, market demand for socially responsible investment is increasing. We test the suitability of (a) multiple attribute utility theory, (b) theory of planned behavior, and (c) issue-contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations to explain socially responsible investment behavior. In an experimental setting, 141 participants traded company shares on a computerized asset market. Over 12 periods, companies varied in morality and in profitability. Participants' bids and asks for shares were recorded. Results indicate that moral considerations influence investment decisions, controlling for profit. Differences between the three models are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
